The relationship between organizational culture and innovation through Vietnamese employee’s perspective

Nham Phong Tuan1,, Pham Thi Trang1
1 University of Economics and Business

Main Article Content

Abstract

In a globalized business setting, a national culture that impacts strongly innovation is of utmost importance especially in developing countries that expect to improve income levels and compete globally. Since organizational culture is embedded in national culture, studying culture at the organizational level is apt especially when organizational culture and innovation have been found to increase performance. This study examines relationship between organizational culture and innovation through Vietnamese employees’ perspective. More specifically, cultural traits of Empowerment, Team Orientation, Capability Development, Creating Change, Customer Focus and Organizational Learning on Innovation are considered in this paper. The respondents include 130 Vietnamese employees in both the private and public sectors. The results showed that Organizational learning, capability development, team orientation, creating change were found to be significant contributors to Innovation new to the organization and Innovation new to the industry. Implications and future recommendations are also discussed in this paper.

Article Details

References

1. Arad, Hanson and Schnelder. (1997). A framework for the study of relationships between organizational charactristics and organizational innovation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31 (1), 42-58.
2. Ashley and Bryan. (2009). organizational culture and innovation: exploring the link.
Chicago: Annual best of organizational development submit.
3. Denision and Mishra. (1995). Toward a theory of organizaational culture and effectiveness.
Organizationa Science, 6(2), 204-223.
4. Denision. (1990). Corporate culture and organization effectiveness. New York: Wiley.
5. Denison. (1996). What is the difference between organizatioanl culture and organizational climate: A native’s point of view of a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of management review, 21 (3), 619-624.
6. Flynn and Chatman. (2001). Innovation and social control: oxymoron or opportunity. In Cooper, C., Cartwright, S. and Early, P.S. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture, John Wiley Press, pp. 263-287.
7. Francis, D. and Bessant, J. (2005). Targeting innovation and implications for capability development. Technovation, 25, 171-183.
8. Johannessen, Olsen and Lumpkin. (2001). Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20-31.
9. Kotter and Heskett. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. The free press. New York.
10. Lawson and Shen. (1998). Organizational Psychology: Foundation and applications. New York: Oxford Univrsity press.
11. Lee and Yu. (2004). Corporate culture and Performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(4), 340-359.
12. Luo, Y. (2001). Strategy, structure and performance of MNCs in China, Greenwood Publishing Group, USA.
13. Rahimnia and Alizadeh. (2008). The dimensions of organizational culture based on Denision model of the faculty Ferdowsi university of mashhad. Journal of educational studies and psychology, 35, 147-170.
14. Rashid, S. (2003). The influence of corporate Culture and Organizational Commitment on performance. Journal of management development, 22(8), 708-728.
15. Rosenbush, Brinkmann and Bausch. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? a metaanalysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 441-457.
16. Sparrow. (2001). Developing diagnostics for high performance cultures. In J. W. Press,.
17. Tabachnick and Fidell. (2001). Using Multivariable Statistics. Cmbridge: Harper&Row.
18. West and Farr. (1990). Innovation at work-Innovation and Creativity as work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. Chichester: Wiley.