A Non-Parametric Approach in Measuring the Variances of Compliance Levels of Goodwill Impairment Testing
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this study is to contemplate the degree to which Singaporean firms comply with the highly technical disclosure requirements under FRS 36 specific to goodwill impairment testing. Singapore is chosen because of its advanced and economically significant economy in the heart of Asia, with a highly skilled professional workforce and strong institutional and financial infrastructure to support quality financial reporting. This research examined large listed firms reporting goodwill in three consecutive years, to establish compliance levels and disclosure quality post-transition. The study found that there was a slight improvement in the rate of compliance with accounting requirements over the investigation period.
A significant Friedman test implies that the change was significant and the development is statistically significant. Findings indicated that compliance levels and disclosure quality, although better than prior studies would have suggested, are still sporadic and unpredictable. However, the overall results of the analysis in this study suggest that in the majority of cases the levels of compliance and disclosure quality among the Singaporean listed firms are low. This is particularly so for the cash-generating unit definition and goodwill allocation, and key input variables employed in estimating recoverable amounts of cash generating units (especially on discount rates selection). Based on these results, the majority of Singaporean firms face a high degree of difficulty in the translation from idea to action in implementing the requirements of the standard. Further, questions are raised about the quality of accounting information among goodwill-intensive firms in Singapore and the robustness of regulatory oversight institutions operating within Singapore.
Article Details
Keywords
Impairment Testing, FRS 36, Financial Reporting, Singapore
References
2. Astami, E. W., Hartadi, B. & Tower, G., (2006), “Factors Explaining Management Preferences of Accounting for Goodwill Prior to the Implementation of IFRS 3 - A CrossCountry Study”, Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 43-67.
3. Ball, R., (2001), Infrastructure Requirements for an Economically Efficient System of Public Financial Reporting and Disclosure in Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, Brooking Institution Press, Washington DC.
4. Ball, R., Robin, A. & Wu, J. S., (2003), “Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in Four East Asian Countries”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 36, iss. 1-3, pp. 235-270.
5. Bhattacharjee, S. & Islam, M. Z., (2009), “Problems of Adoption and Application of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Bangladesh”, International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 4, iss. 12, pp. 153-164.
6. Belkaoui, A., (1985), Accounting Theory, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, San Diego.
7. Buzby, S. L. (1974). “Selected Items of Information and Their Disclosure in Annual Reports.” The Accounting Review Vol. 49 (3): pp. 423-435.
8. Carlin, T.M, Finch, N, et al. (2014). “IFRS Compliance in the Year of the Pig: Hong Kong Impairment Testing”. Journal of Economics & Development. Vol. 16:1. pp. 23-39.
9. Carlin, T. M. and N. Finch. (2013). “Discount Rate in Disarray. Evidence on Flawed Goodwill Impairment Testing”.
10. Carlin, T. M., Finch, N. & Laili, N. H., (2009), “Goodwill Accounting in Malaysia and the Transition to IFRS - A Compliance Assessment of Large First Year Adopters’”, Journal of Financial Reporting & Accounting, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 75-104.
11. Cearns, K. (1999). Understanding CGUs. Accountancy International.
12. Choi, F. D. and G. K. Meek (2004). International Accounting, Prentice Hall.
13. Elliott, J. A. & Shaw, W. H., (1988), “Write-Offs as Accounting Procedures to Manage Perceptions”, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 26, iss. Supplement, pp. 91-119.
14. Griffith, C. H. & William, T. H., (1960), “Measuring Adequate Disclosure”, Journal of Accountancy, vol. 109, iss. April, pp. 43-48.
15. Hassan, M. S., Salleh, N. M. & Rahman, M. R. C. A., (2008), “Determinants of Financial Instruments Disclosure Quality among Listed Firms in Malaysia”, Available at SSRN: www.ssrn.com/abstract=1157788.
16. Hope, O.-K., (2003), “Disclosure Practices, Enforcement of Accounting Standards and Analysts’ Forecast Accuracy: An International Study”, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 41, iss. 2, pp. 235-272.
17. Jaafar, A. & Mcleay, S., (2007), “Country Effects and Sector Effects on the Harmonization of Accounting Policy Choice”, Abacus, vol. 43, iss. 2, pp. 156-189.
18. Lonergan, W. (2007). “AIFRS - A Practitioner’s Viewpoint.” The Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance Vol. 2 (1): pp. 9-19.
19. Lonergan, W., (2010), “Impairment - A Commercial Perspective”, Managerial Finance, vol. 36, iss. 9, pp. 812-826.
20. Massoud, M. F. and C. A. Raiborn (2003). “Accounting for Goodwill? Are We Better Off?” Review of Business Vol. 24 (2): pp. 26-33.
21. Mirza, A. A., Orrell, M. & Holt, G. J., (2008), Wiley IFRS: Practical Implementation Guide and Workbook, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
22. Nobes, C. W. & Parker, R. B., (2008), Comparative International Accounting, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, England.
23. Owusu-Ansah, S., (1998), “The Impact of Corporate Attribites on the Extent of Mandatory Disclosure and Reporting by Listed Companies in Zimbabwe”, The International Journal of Accounting, vol. 33, iss. 5, pp. 605-631.
24. Patuelli, R., Longhi, S., Reggiani, A., Nijkamp, P. and Blien, U., (2007), “A Rank-Order Test on the Statistical Performance of Neural Network Models for Regional Labor Market Forecasts”. The Review of Regional Studies, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2007.
25. Sevin, S., R. Schroeder, et al. (2007). “Transparent Financial Disclosure and SFAS No. 142.” Managerial Auditing Journal Vol. 22 (7): pp. 674-687.
26. Teodori, C. and M. Veneziani (2007). Intangible Assets in Annual Reports: A Disclosure Index (3rd Annual Workshop). European Financial Reporting Research Group - Accounting in Europe, Paris.
27. Wilson, G. P., (1996), “Discussion Write-Offs: Manipulation or Impairment?” Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 34, pp. 171-177.