Best manufacturing practices and firm performance in the context of Vietnam’s mechanical enterprises

Dao Minh Anh1,
1 Foreign Trade University

Main Article Content


The results of past studies show that applying best manufacturing practices has promoted firms to improve performance with mixed success. This study aims to examine the extent to which mechanical firms in Vietnam context have adopted best manufacturing practices and whether these practices contribute to firm performance. A structured questionnaire has been developed based on literature of best practices known as world-class. Out of the 204 questionnaires sent, 122 completed replies were received and valid. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis. The results show that most of best manufacturing practices are adopted and implemented with fairly high degree of acceptance. Three over fourteen best practices (JIT delivery by suppliers, supplier quality management and equipment layout) are proved to be significant and positively related to financial performance, while four over fourteen best practices (JIT delivery by suppliers, cleanliness and organization, Kanban and maintenance) are significantly and positively related to nonfinancial performance. Implications, recommendations and future research are discussed.

Article Details


1. Ahmad, S., Schroeder, R. G., Sinha, K. K. (2003), “The role of infrastructure practices in the effectiveness of JIT practices: implications for plant competitiveness”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(2003), 161-191.
2. Anuar, A., Yusuff, R. M. (2011), “Manufacturing best practices in Malaysian small and medium enterprises (SMEs)”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 324-340.
3. Banker, R. D., Potter, G., Schroeder, R. G. (1993), “Reporting manufacturing performance measures to workers: An empirical study”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5, pp.33-55.
4. Battistoni et al. (2013), “An analysis of the effect of operations management practices on performance”, International Journal of Engineering Business Management, Vol. 5, 44.
5. Cua, K. O., McKone, K. E., Schroeder, R., G. (2001), “Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance”, Journal of Operations Management, 19(2001), 675-694.
6. Cua, K. O., McKone-Sweet, K. E., Schroeder, R. G. (2006), “Improving performance through an integrated manufacturing program”, The Quality Management Journal, Vol. 13, No. 3, pg.45.
7. Davies, A. J., Kochhar, A. K. (2002), “Manufacturing best practice and performance studies: a critique”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 289-305.
8. Dilber, M. et al. (2005), Critical factors of total quality management and its effect on performance in health care industry: A Turkish experience. Problems and Perspectives in Management, Vol. 4/2005, pp. 220-235.
9. Duarte, A., Brito, L., Serio, L., Martins, G. (2011), “Operational practices and financial performance: an Empirical analysis of Brazilian manufacturing companies”, Brazilian Administration Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 395-411.
10. Flynn, B. B. (1994), “The relationship between quality management practices, infrastructure and fast production innovation”, Benhmarking for Quality Management & Techonology, Vol. 1, No.1, pp.48-64.
11. Flynn, B. B., Sakakibara, S., Schroeder, R. G. (1995), “Relationship between JIT and TQM: practices and performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 1325-1360.
12. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. & Anderson, R. (2014), Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.) London: Pearson Education Limited.
13. Kannan, V. R., Tan, K. C. (2005), “Just in time, total quality management and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance”, Omega, Vol. 33, pp. 153-162.
14. Ketokivi, M., Schroeder, R. G. (2004a), “Strategic, structural contingency and institutional explanations in the adoption of innovative manufacturing practices”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 22 (2004), pp. 63-89.
15. Ketokivi, M., Schroeder, R. G. (2004b), “Manufacturing practices, strategic fit and performance: A routine-based view”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 171-191.
16. Kristal, M., Huang, X., Schroeder, R. G. (2010), “The effect of quality management on mass customization capability”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 30, No.9, pp. 900-922.
17. Matsui, Y. (2007), “An empirical analysis of just-in-time production in Japaneses manufacturing companies”, International Journal of Production Economics, 108(2007), 153-164.
18. Phan, C. A. (2014), Impacts of quality management practices on competitive performance in manufacturing companies: Experiences from the United States, Japan, Germany, Italy and Korea. Hanoi: Vietnam National University Publisher.
19. Prime Minister of Vietnam (2014). Direction No 16/CT-TTg dated 18/6/2014 about overcoming difficulty and promoting the implementation of Vietnam’s mechanical industry development strategy.
20. Rungtusanatham, M., et. al. (2005). “TQM across multiple countries: Convergence Hypothesis versus national specificity arguments”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 23, pp. 43-63.
21. Sakakibara, S., et. al, (1997), “The impact of Just-in-time manufacturing and its infrastructure on manufacturing performance”, Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 9, pp. 1246-1257.
22. Seedee, R., Sulaiman, M., Ismail, I. (2009), Best business practices and performance in ceramics industry in Thailand, 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics. UK: Cambridge University.
23. Viet Nga (2015), New strategy for Vietnam’s mechanical industry, accessed 15 May 2017, available at Accessed on 30.10.2016.
24. Voss, C., Blackmon, K. (1996), “The impact of national and parent company origin on world class manufacturing: Findings from Britain and Germany”, International Journal of Operations & Production, Vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 98-109.
25. Yusuff, R. M. (2004), “Manufacturing best practices of the electric and electronic firms in Malaysia”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 361369.