Impacts of cost stickiness on profitability: The case of listed companies in Vietnam
Main Article Content
Abstract
According to the traditional cost behavior, costs are categorized as fixed or variable costs. Variable costs change proportionately with changes in the activity driver. Nevertheless, empirical evidence shows that cost increase with activity increase is more rapid than cost decrease with activity decrease. This phenomenon is named as sticky cost.
In this paper, we measure the cost stickiness of each company and answer the research question that whether sticky costs affect the profitability of listed companies in Vietnam. We find that selling costs, general costs, and administration costs of listed companies in Vietnam are sticky in period 2011 – 2015, and the situation is more serious than the case of US and Brazil. Our analysis shows that the stickiness of selling and administration costs affects the earnings per share forecast. The paper suggests some recommendations for managers to avoid the negative effects of sticky cost on business performance.
Article Details
Keywords
Sticky cost, selling and administration costs, cost behavior, firm profitability
References
2. Banker, R., D. Byzalovy, and J. Plehn-Dujowichz. (2011), “Sticky cost behavior: theory and evidence”, Working paper, Temple University.
3. Banker, L., and L. Chen. (2006), “Predicting earnings using a model based on cost variability and cost stickiness”, The Accounting Review, vol. 81, pp. 285 – 307.
4. Cannon Jame. N (2014), “Determinants of “Sticky Costs”: An Analysis of Cost Behavior using United States Air Transportation Industry Data”. The Accounting Review: September 2014, Vol. 89, No. 5, pp. 1645-1672.
5. Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., and Thomas, D. (2006), “A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons”, Management Accounting Research, pp 127–140. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.001.
6. Cooper, R., and J. Haltiwanger (2006), “On the nature of capital adjustment costs”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 73, 2006, pp. 611-633.
7. He, D., Teruya, J., and Shimizu, T. (2010), “Sticky Selling, General, and Administrative Cost Behavior and its Changes in Japan”, Global Journal of Business Research, 4(4), 1–10., Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1871276.
8. De Medeiros, Otavio Ribeiro and Costa, Patricia De Souza (2004), “Cost Stickiness in Brazilian Firms”, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=632365. or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.632365.
9. MG. Fasarany, Ardabil, Azim Aslani and Mohammad Imani. (2015), “Sticky cost behavior and accounting conservatism: evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange”, International Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 2, No. 3.
10. Rhee, C. S., Kim, J., and Lee, S. (2012), “Sticky Cost Behavior: Quantity Based Approach”. AAA 2012 Management Accounting Section (MAS), http://aaahq.org/ AM2012/abstract.cfm?submissionID=846.
11. Roodzant, C. H. (2012), “Cost Behavior and Prior Year Earnings: Evidence for US-listed Firms”, Tilburg University, Netherlands (Master’s thesis).
12. Jamal Abu-Serdaneh (2014), “The Asymmetric Behavior of Cost: Evidence from Jordan”, International Business Research; Vol. 7, No. 8, ISSN 1913-9004 E-ISSN 1913-9012.
13. Via, N. D., and Perego, P. (2013), “Sticky cost behavior: Evidence from small and medium sized companies”, Accounting & Finance, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.2226399
14. Warganegara DL. and DW. Tamara (2014), “The Impacts of Cost Stickiness on the Profitability of Indonesian Firms”, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering Vol:8, No:11.
15. Weiss, D. (2010), “Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts”, The Accounting Review, 85(4), pp. 1441-1471.