Exploratory Factor Analysis on determinant factors to tax evasion behavior: Vietnamese personal income tax case

Nguyen Thu Hang1,
1 Foregn Trade University

Main Article Content


Theoretical underpinnings and prior works have shown a dozen of determinants to tax evasion behavior. Some suggests categories of variables have been identified in tax evasion literature; however, these groups are manually divided basing on historical record of literature. Therefore, the study would base on data survey questionnaire on Vietnamese personal income tax case and apply Exploratory Factors Analysis technique to test and figure out determinant factor groups. The result suggests that there are four main determinant factors groups to tax evasion behavior, including deterrence factor, government performance factor, policy fairness factor, and tax knowledge factor

Article Details


1. Allingham, M.G. and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis.
Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/00472727(72)90010-2
2. Ali, M., Fjeldstad, O.H. and Sjursen, I. H. (2014). To Pay or Not to Pay? Citizens’ Attitudes toward Taxation in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, and South Africa. World Development 64: 828–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.006
3. Alm, J. (2015). Understanding and Combatting Tax Evasion. Tulane Economics Working Paper Series, Working Paper 1508
4. Alm, J. (2011). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. International Tax Public Finance (2012) 19:54–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9171-2
5. Anh Hong (2016). Concerns with personal income tax: do not spend with the sick person. The Youth online journal, available on http://tuoitre.vn/tin/kinh-te/20161216/ tang-xong-voi-thue-tncn-ban-can-nha-nop-thue-2-lan/1236922.html (access on 14th July 2017)
6. Creswell, W.J. (2014). Research Design. SAGE Publications, Inc., the 4th Edition
7. Flatworldsolution (nd). What are different types of questionnaires? Available online at https://www.flatworldsolutions.com/research-analysis/articles/different-typesquestionnaires.php
8. GmbH (2010). Addressing tax evasion and tax avoidance in developing countries.
Available online at https://www.taxcompact.net/documents/2011-09-09_GTZ_ Addressing-tax-evasion-and-avoidance.pdf (accessed on 7th November 2016)
9. Hoai Thanh (2017). To assess the government performance and effectiveness through people’s perception and satisfaction. Vietnamnet, available online at http://vietnamnet. vn/vn/kinh-doanh/dau-tu/thu-tuong-nguyen-xuan-phuc-lay-su-hai-long-cua-nguoidan-lam-thuoc-do-cho-ket-qua-cong-viec-401346.html
10. Hasseldine, H.D. and Bebbington, J.K. (1991). Blending economic deterrence and fiscalpsychology models in the design of responses to tax evasion: the New Zealand experience. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 299-324. https://doi. org/
11. Kumar, R., 2005. Research Methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. SAGE Publications, the 2nd Edition, p 132
12. McGee, R.W. (2006). Tax evasion and ethics: a demographic study of 33 countries. Workingpaper, Andreas School of Business, Barry University, Miami, FL
13. Owens, J. and Parry, R. (2009). Why tax matters for development. OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, available online at http://oecdobserver.org/news/ archivestory.php/aid/2943/Why_tax_matters_for_development.html(accessed on 17 October 2016)
14. Pomerleau, K. (2015). Sources of Government Revenue across the OECD 2015. Fiscal Fact No. 465, Apr.2015, Tax Foundation
15. Wright, V. (2010). Evolution vs. Severity of Punishment. The Sentencing Project. Retrieved 13 October 2012