Main Article Content
Determining sample size requirements for structural equation modeling (SEM) is a challenge often faced by investigators, peer reviewers, and grant writers. One study found that 80 per cent of the research articles in a particular stream of SEM literature drew conclusions from insufficient samples. This paper aims to suggest substantive applications of techniques verifying adequate sample size needed to produce trustworthy result when researchers conduct structural equation modeling technique in supply chain management (SCM) discipline. The paper reviewed a set of 42 empirical research articles in supply chain management research with respect to the application of structural equation modeling, choice of its sample size, conducted modern techniques and related factors affecting the decision. It is concluded that most of the studies achieve widely accepted rules of thumb with sufficient observations in sample size. However, there is no considerable attention paid to important influenced factors and very few studies take notice of modern sample size estimation technique such as statistical power analysis. Based on the critical analysis, recommendations are offered.
sample size, structural equation modeling, supply chain management
2. Andrew, J. T., & Niels, G. W. 2005. Structural Equation Modeling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1: 31-65.
3. Antony, P., Augustine, A. L., & Injazz, J. C. 2008. Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer– supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 26: 45-64.
4. Barbara, G. T., & Linda, S. F. 2001. Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.): Boston.
5. Canan, K., Carol, P., & Robert, D. K. 2007. Linking forward and reverse supply chain investments: The role of business uncertainty. Journal of Operations Management, 25: 11411160.
6. Chinho, L., Wing, S. C., Christian, N. M., Chu-Hua, K., Pei, P. Y., & 2005. 2005. A structural equation model of supply chain quality management and organizational performance. International journal of production economics, 96: 355 - 365.
7. Christopher, W. J. 2010. Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9 (6 ): 478.
8. Clifford, D., Theodore, P. S., & Terry, E. 2010. Performance implications of transformational supply chain leadership and followership. INternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(10): 763-791.
9. Coyle, J., Langley, C., Novack, R., & Gibson, B. 2013. Supply Chain Management (9th ed.): Thomson Learning.
10. Cristina, G., Rudolf, L., & Eva, V. 2005. SCM Research Methodologies: Employing Structural Equation Modeling, Research Methodologies in Supply chain management. Germany: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
11. Daniel, R., Richard, P., & Gernot, K. 2012. Customer-facing supply chain practices— The impact of demand and distribution management on supply chain success. Journal of Operations Management, 30: 269-281.
12. Dutch, F., Lorraine, S. L., Robert, A. L., & William, J. K. 2012. Effect of internal cost management, information systems integration, and absorptive capacity on inter-organizational cost management in supply chains. Accounting, Organizations and Sociery 37: 168-187.
13. Erika, J. W., Kelly, M. H., Shaunna, L. C., & Mark, W. M. 2013. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
14. Felix, T. S. C., & Alain, Y.-L. C. 2013. Determinants of mobile supply chain management system diffusion: a structural equation analysis of manufacturing firms. INternational Journal of Production Research, 51(4): 1196-1213.
15. Ganesh, V., & Sarv, D. 2008. The role of quality in e-procurement performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 26: 407-425.
16. Gensheng, L., & George, D. D. 2011. Linking supply chain management with mass customization capability. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(7): 668-683.
17. Gilbert, N. N., Judith, M. W., & Daniel, F. L. 2010. Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? Journal of Operations Management, 28: 101-114.
18. Gunjan, S., & Rambabu, K. 2012. A critical review of empirical research methodology in supply chain management. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(6): 753779.
19. Guy, A., Vincenzo, E. V., & Peter, O. C. 2010. Structural Equation Modeling in Tourism Demand Forecasting: A Critical ReviewJournal of Travel and Tourism Research, Spring/.
20. Herbert, W. M., Alexandre, J. S. M., Philip, D. P., & Gurvinder, K. 2014. Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: An Integration of the Best Features of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(85): 110.
21. Hojung, S. a., David, A. C., & Darryl, D. W. 2000. Supply management orientation and supplierrbuyer performance. Journal of Operations Management, 18: 317-333.
22. Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. 2007. An introduction to structural equation modeling. Family Science Review (11): 354-373.
23. Injazz, J. C., Antony, P., & Augustine, A. L. 2004. Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22: 505-523.
24. Jeffrey, C. M., & Gregory, L. S. 2007. Using Structural Equation Modeling With Forensic Samples. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34: 1560 - 1587.
25. Jichuan, W., & Xiaoqian, W. 2012. Sample size for structural equation modeling, Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
26. John, F. K., Glenn, R. J., Haozhe, C., & Scott, N. 2011. Technology emergence between mandate and acceptance: an exploratory examination of RFID. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(7): 697-716.
27. Jonathan, W. K., Michael, A. M., & Ali, K. 2001. A structural equation model assessment of logistics strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 22(3): 284-305.
28. Joseph, F. H. J., William, C. B., Barry, J. B., & Rolph, E. A. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.): Upper Saddle River.
29. Keah, C. T., Vijay, R. K., Chin-Chun, H., & Keong, L. 2010. Supply chain information and relational alignments: mediators of EDI on firm performance. INternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(5): 377-394.
30. Kenneth, W. G. J., Dwayne, W., & Anthony, I. 2008. The impact of logistics performance on organizational performance in a supply chain context. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13(4): 317-327.
31. Kenneth, W. G. J., Dwayne, W., & Anthony, I. 2012. Aligning marketing strategies throughout the supply chain to enhance performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 41: 1008 - 1018.
32. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
33. Kline, R. B. 2010. Methodology in the Social Sciences : Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.): Guilford Press
34. Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. 2007. Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Practical Considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3): 33-43.
35. Mangan, J., Lalwani, C., Butcher, T., & Javadpour, R. 2012. Global Logistics and Supply Chain Management (2nd ed.): Wiley.
36. Marcus, W., & Jurgen, W. 2005. Structural Equation Modeling as a Basis for Theory Development within Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research, Research Methodologies in Supply chain management. Germany: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
37. Mei, C., & Qingyu, Z. 2011. Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29: 163-180.
38. Michael, J. B., & Nallan, C. S. 2009. The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27: 119-140.
39. Michael, T. 2004. Transportation Effectiveness and Manufacturing Firm Performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2).
40. Ming-Chih, T., Wen, L., & Hsin-Chieh, W. 2010. Determinants of RFID adoption intention: Evidence from Taiwanese retail chains. Information & Management, 47: 255-261.
41. Murugesan, P., Ponnusamy, M., & Ganesan, L. 2012. A combined application of structural equation modeling (SEM) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in supplier selection. Benchmarking: An International Journal 19(1): 70-92.
42. Nada, R. S. 2008. Pattern of information technology use: The impact on buyer–suppler coordination and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 26: 349-367.
43. Nakano, M. 2008. Collaborative forecasting and planning in supply chains The impact on performance in Japanese manufacturers. INternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(2): 84-105.
44. Natasha, K. B., & Shenyang, G. 2011. Structural Equation Modeling: Oxford Scholarship Online.
45. Patricia, M. S., Soumen, G., & Nagesh, M. 2006. The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24: 170188.
46. Paul, D. C., Robert, B. H., Lawson, B., & Kenneth, J. P. 2006. Creating supply chain relational capital: The impact of formal and informal socialization processes. Journal of Operations Management, 24: 851-863.
47. Paul, H., Oahn, T., & Kihyun, P. 2010. Electronic commerce applications for supply chain integration and competitive capabilities. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(4): 539-560.
48. Peter, T., Kevin, M., Marcos, P. V. d. O., & Marcelo, B. L. 2010. The impact of business analytics on supply chain performance. Decision Support Systems, 49: 318-327.
49. Prakash, J. S., & Damien, P. 2009. The nature and effectiveness of collaboration between firms, their customers and suppliers: a supply chain perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3): 189-200.
50. Rachna, S., & Susan, M. G. 2006. Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management 24: 148-169.
51. Sang, M. L., DonHee, L., & Schniederjans, M. J. 2011. Supply chain innovation and organizational performance in the healthcare industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(11): 1193 - 1214.
52. Sezhiyan, D. M., & Nambirajan, T. 2010. An empirical investigation on relationships between critical supply chain management activities and supplier selection on the business performance using Structural Equation Model. Journal of International Business and Economics, 10(1).
53. Shaohan, C., Minjoon, J., & Zhilin, Y. 2010. Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust. Journal of Operations Management, 28: 257-268.
54. Shawnee, K. V., Jayanth, J., Cornelia, D., & Roger, C. 2003. The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 21: 523-539.
55. Sonia, K., Ned, K., Ronaldo, P., & Jacques, V. 2012. The impact of individualism on buyer– supplier relationship norms, trust and market performance: An analysis of data from Brazil and the U.S.A. International Business Review, 21: 782-793.
56. Su, Y.-f., & Chyan, Y. 2010. A structural equation model for analyzing the impact of ERP on SCM. Expert Systems with Applications, 37: 456-469.
57. Sufian, Q., Monideepa, T., & Ragu-Nathan. 2012. Examining alignment between supplier management practices and information systems strategy. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(4): 604-617.
58. Suhong, L. S., Bhanu, R.-N., Ragu-Nathan, & Subba, R. 2006. The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. The International Journal of Management Science, 34: 107 - 124.
59. Suhong, L. S., Subba, R., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Bhanu, R.-N. 2005. Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices.
Journal of Operations Management, 23: 618-641.
60. Susan, L. G., Donna, F. D., & Teresa, M. M. 2005. A Balanced Approach to Research in Supply Chain Management, Research Methodologies in Supply chain management. Germany: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
61. Tenko, R., & Keith, F. W. 1995. Issues in applied structural equation modeling research. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(4): 289-318.
62. Thomas, F. G. 2001. Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior Reseaerch University of California, Irvine: Institue of Transportation Studies
63. UQBS. 2012. UQ Business School Adjusted ERA Ranking List. University of Queensland: University of Queensland.
64. Wing, S. C., Christian, N. M., Chu-Hua, K., Min, H. L., Chinho, L., & Hojung, T. 2008. Supply chain management in the US and Taiwan: An empirical study. The International Journal of Management Science 36: 665 - 678.
65. Wong, T. C., Kris, M. Y. L., Hon, K. Y., & Ngan, S. C. 2011. Analyzing supply chain operation models with the PC-algorithm and the neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 7526-7534.
66. Zach, G. Z., Nancy, W. N., & Robert, F. L. 2011. Capabilities that enhance outcomes of an episodic supply chain collaboration. Journal of Operations Management, 29: 591-603.